THE PLATFORM

• Lower maternal mortality rates by strengthening the ability of doctors to help make medical decisions, including reproductive rights
• Lower teen suicides by strengthening the ability of doctors to help make medical decisions, including gender-affirming care

• Exceptional Children - Due Process Bill for Special Education 
• Exceptional Children - Expert Fee
• Student's Rights 
• Exceptional Children - Restrictions on Restraint and Seclusion 
• Sexual orientation and gender identity along with other protected class discrimination law

• Expand Providence out to Waxhaw
• Expand funding to allow Legal Aid clinics in all counties at least monthly if not a full-time office
• Provide more funding for access to court
• Revise Records Request
• State-wide Anti-discrimination law including sexual orientation, gender identity, natural hair, etc
• Crime Bill To include sexual orientation and gender identity
  Explicit Prior Permission - Expand (Have Bill)
• Decrease "cool off period" for certain reasons like domestic violence, adultery, or abandonment for
  Increase Minimum child support to be based on full time Minimum wage

Ensuring access to gender-affirming therapy and care for transgender youth, their parents, and transgender adults involves several interconnected steps. Firstly, advocating for policies that include coverage of these services in healthcare plans is crucial to ensure financial accessibility. Concurrently, providing comprehensive education and resources to healthcare providers is essential to enhance their knowledge and sensitivity towards transgender individuals' needs. Strengthening and enforcing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is pivotal in prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity in healthcare settings. Education efforts aimed at the public and medical professionals are necessary to increase awareness and sensitivity towards transgender individuals' needs. Simplifying the process for reporting discrimination and implementing robust enforcement mechanisms are vital to protect transgender individuals' rights. Additionally, codifying extensions to state discrimination laws, such as those in North Carolina, can offer further legal safeguards. Moreover, establishing support groups and community resources is imperative to assist transgender youth and adults in navigating their gender identity journey with acceptance and dignity. Empowering parents and medical professionals to make informed decisions while respecting the autonomy of transgender youth in their medical choices is essential for comprehensive care, while also respecting the autonomy of transgender adults in making their own medical choices.

Promoting comprehensive sex education, including curriculum relevant to LGBTQ+ students, is essential for fostering inclusive and informed communities. Supporting medically accurate, evidence-based sex education that covers age-appropriate information about abstinence, FDA-approved birth control methods, and the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including condoms, is crucial. Incorporating inclusive curriculum, as advocated by organizations like the American Bar Association and Planned Parenthood, can contribute to better public health outcomes and ensure that all students receive education that reflects their identities and experiences. Additionally, providing instruction by trained experts on sexual and reproductive health, including topics such as obtaining consent and understanding who is capable of giving consent, is paramount for promoting healthy relationships and preventing sexual violence. By advocating for and implementing comprehensive sex education, we can empower LGBTQ+ students and all young people to make informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive health.

As a baby loss and multiple high-risk pregnancy mom, I know firsthand how risky pregnancy to the mother is and how little of a guarantee that you have of taking home a live baby, even with great medical care. Many wanted and cherished pregnancies have ended with an abortion to save the mother or to end it before it caused issues. A pregnant person should not need to leave a medical facility to seek another medical procedure, especially traveling out of state. There are many other reasons that a person who can become pregnant may need an abortion. This person should be able to get this medical care in a safe environment.

The limits set by Roe v Wade in 1973 was working for the most part and was based on science and decades of understanding of the risks involved in pregnancy by allowing the medical professionals and the pregnant person to make sound medical decisions. Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization needs to be overturned and that the state's should not restrict earlier than 24 weeks.

As a mother who has experienced baby loss and multiple high-risk pregnancies, I empathize deeply with the complexities and uncertainties surrounding pregnancy and the difficult decisions that may arise, including the need for abortion. It is crucial that individuals who can become pregnant have access to safe and timely abortion care, especially when their health or life is at risk, or when the pregnancy poses significant challenges or complications.

The limits set by Roe v. Wade in 1973 have provided a framework that balances the rights of pregnant individuals with the interests of the state, based on medical science and the understanding of pregnancy risks at the time. However, recent legal challenges, such as Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, threaten to erode these protections and impose severe restrictions on abortion access.

Overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to restrict abortion earlier than 24 weeks is a significant setback for reproductive rights and maternal health. It could force pregnant individuals to seek unsafe and clandestine abortions, leading to unnecessary harm and even death. Moreover, restricting abortion based on arbitrary gestational limits fails to account for the complex medical circumstances that may necessitate later-term abortions, such as fetal abnormalities or maternal health risks.

Instead, I believe that abortion care should be guided by medical necessity and the expertise of healthcare professionals, with internal oversight and safeguards in place to ensure patient safety and well-being. Pregnant individuals and their healthcare providers should be trusted to make informed and compassionate decisions about their reproductive health, free from unnecessary legal barriers and government interference.

In conclusion, it is imperative that we uphold the principles of Roe v. Wade and protect access to safe and legal abortion care for all individuals who may need it. Overturning Roe v. Wade and imposing draconian restrictions on abortion access endangers the lives and health of pregnant individuals and undermine their fundamental rights to autonomy and bodily integrity.

As a babyloss and multiple high-risk pregnancy mom, I know firsthand how risky pregnancy to the mother is and how little of a guarantee that you have of taking home a live baby, even with great medical care. Many wanted and cherished pregnancies have ended with an abortion to save the mother or to end it before it caused  issues. A pregnant person should not need to leave a medical facility to seek another medical procedure, especially traveling out of state. There are many other reasons that a person who can become pregnant may need an abortion. This person should be able to get this medical in a safe environment.

I support Medicare for All or other proposed healthcare policies without work reporting requirements or additional cost-sharing. Healthcare is a fundamental human right, and access to affordable, comprehensive healthcare should not be contingent on employment status or financial resources. Implementing Medicare for All or similar universal healthcare programs would ensure that every individual has access to the care they need, regardless of their employment status or ability to pay.

Work reporting requirements and additional cost-sharing mechanisms create barriers to healthcare access, particularly for low-income individuals and marginalized communities. These requirements disproportionately burden those who may already face systemic barriers to employment, such as individuals with disabilities, caregivers, and those experiencing homelessness. Moreover, cost-sharing measures like deductibles, copayments, and premiums can deter individuals from seeking necessary medical treatment, leading to poorer health outcomes and increased healthcare costs in the long run.

By eliminating work reporting requirements and cost-sharing, we can create a more equitable healthcare system that prioritizes the well-being of all individuals. Healthcare should be based on need, not on one's ability to pay or meet bureaucratic requirements. Implementing Medicare for All or similar policies would not only improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare disparities but also promote economic stability and social justice for all members of society.

Advocating for comprehensive healthcare in rural communities, particularly in North Carolina, involves implementing multifaceted strategies to address the challenges posed by the decreasing number of hospitals and healthcare providers. Firstly, promoting telehealth services can help bridge the gap by providing remote access to healthcare professionals and specialists. This includes advocating for policies that expand reimbursement for telehealth services and investing in broadband infrastructure to ensure reliable internet connectivity in rural areas.

Furthermore, incentivizing healthcare professionals to practice in rural areas through loan forgiveness programs, scholarships, and grants can bolster the availability of healthcare services. Collaborating with community health centers, clinics, and nonprofit organizations to establish mobile clinics or telemedicine centers can bring essential healthcare services closer to rural residents.

Additionally, supporting initiatives that focus on preventive care, health education, and chronic disease management can help improve overall health outcomes in rural communities. Advocating for funding and resources to upgrade and modernize existing rural healthcare facilities is also crucial to ensure they can meet the evolving healthcare needs of their communities.

Moreover, engaging with local stakeholders, including community leaders, policymakers, and healthcare providers, to understand the unique challenges and needs of rural communities is essential for developing tailored solutions. By advocating for these initiatives and policies, comprehensive healthcare can be more accessible and sustainable in rural areas of North Carolina.

I support paid family and medical leave as a universal right. In many countries, individuals contribute to a program that provides paid time off, similar to short-term disability. This approach ensures that individuals have financial support during times of need, such as illness or caregiving responsibilities. The duration of paid leave should be sufficient to meet the needs of individuals and their families, and it could be divided between parents or family members to accommodate various caregiving responsibilities. By implementing such a system, we can support families, promote gender equality, and strengthen societal well-being.

I wholeheartedly approve of prioritizing mental healthcare. If elected, I am committed to championing legislation that will:

1. Expand access to mental health care, ensuring that every American can receive the support they need.

2. Invest in youth mental health services, fostering wellness and intervening early to prevent long-term struggles.

3. Enhance crisis response mechanisms to swiftly assist anyone experiencing a mental health emergency. 

It's imperative we work towards a society where everyone has the support they need to thrive mentally and emotionally.

My Platform from the beginning included education, especially public education. The issues are from the student perspective, but helping the students receive a free and sound education in a public school setting will benefit the teachers and staff too. Each of these issues either have students who I personally know who needs it and some have been place on the forefront by the current General Assembly who are trying to make it harder and harder for students to feel safe in school.

I already have four proposed bills ready to file with three being in education. The three bills are focused on Exceptional Children, but Educators who work with Exceptional Children will benefit too. The three bills focus on due process, expert fees, and restraint and seclusion restrictions. I would also try to combat the destructive SB49 and other bills passed last session through new bills to strengthen student's rights, discrimination laws, and bills like H885.  As to who I would ask to co-sponsor from a different party would be contingent on who becomes legislatures in 2024. I would have asked Jeffery Elmore because he was a past educator, but he is running for Lt. Governor and also moved to the political culture wars. These bills are more about justice and safety of disabled students. It should be easy to get co-sponsors. I have worked on getting legislatures to file it in 2025 before running for office and have several on the Education Committee looking at already. They were all surprised that it was done in the current way. There main concerns are based on cost to the local education agency which have been shown by other states that costs do not increase for various reasons. Please go to https://votecristal.com/platform-2  to see my platform.  

The Parent Bill of Rights will impact students by making some students homeless and even some to become suicidal or abused by family, other students, and the community with some actually becoming dead either by their own hands or other people. I think it will make the school's job harder through trying to comply with the law and trying to keep students safe inside the classroom, outside the classroom, and at home. 

According to the most recent Youth Risk Behavior Survey, nearly half of all LGBTQ+ youth in North Carolina seriously considered attempting suicide. A memo from the Campaign for Southern states that the new law creates a hostile educational environment for LGBTQ+ students” and that implementing the law would violate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX is a federal law that makes it illegal to discriminate against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in school settings.

Funding: Equitable distribution of funding, ensuring that schools in underserved communities receive sufficient resources. Per-pupil spending, access to advanced courses, and availability of extracurricular activities.

Teachers: Balanced distribution of experienced and qualified teachers across schools. Teacher qualifications, professional development opportunities, and teacher-student ratios.

Early Childhood: Universal access to high-quality early childhood education programs. Preschool enrollment rates, program quality assessments, and kindergarten readiness.

Special Education: Equitable provision of special education services and support for students with diverse needs. Representation of students in special education, access to support services, and inclusion rates.

Advanced Programs: Examine the enrollment of underrepresented groups in advanced placement and gifted programs. A lack of diversity may indicate barriers to access.

Health Services: Consider the health and well-being of students, including access to nutritious meals and mental health services. Healthy students are better positioned to thrive academically.

Curriculum and Instruction: Inclusive and culturally responsive curriculum that reflects diverse perspectives. Representation of diverse voices in instructional materials, cultural competency training for educators, and student engagement.

Technology: Universal access to technology resources for both in-school and remote learning. Availability of devices, internet connectivity, and digital literacy programs.

School Climate and Culture: Implementation of policies promoting a positive and inclusive school culture. Reduction in disciplinary disparities, student surveys on school climate, and implementation of restorative justice practices.

College and Career Readiness: Equitable access to resources preparing students for higher education and career paths. College enrollment rates, career guidance programs, and access to vocational training.

To address school safety and mental health needs without compromising the learning environment, the General Assembly could implement a comprehensive strategy. This might involve allocating resources for:

Training Programs: Invest in professional development for teachers and staff to recognize signs of mental health issues and handle crises effectively. This can create a supportive environment for students.

Counseling Services: Increase funding for school counseling services. This includes hiring more counselors and providing ongoing training to meet the diverse needs of students.

Mental Health Education: Implement curriculum enhancements to include mental health education. This can help reduce stigma, increase awareness, and equip students with coping mechanisms.

Security Measures: Allocate resources for enhanced security measures, such as surveillance systems, controlled access points, and some trained school resource officers. Balancing safety measures with a welcoming environment is crucial.

Community Partnerships: Foster collaborations with mental health organizations and community resources. This can extend support beyond the school premises and create a network for comprehensive care.

Technology Integration: Invest in technology for monitoring and addressing potential safety concerns. This includes anonymous reporting systems and communication tools to facilitate quick response in emergencies.

Inclusive Policies: Develop and enforce inclusive policies that address the specific needs of different student populations, promoting a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Parental Involvement: Encourage parental involvement through programs that educate parents on recognizing and addressing mental health issues. This partnership can contribute significantly to a holistic approach.

Early Intervention Programs: Allocate funds for early intervention programs targeting students at risk of mental health issues. Identifying and addressing concerns early can prevent escalation.

By adopting a multifaceted approach that combines training, services, education, partnerships, and technology, the General Assembly can create an environment that prioritizes school safety and mental health without compromising the primary goal of education.

The problem of recruiting and retaining educators is not just based on the very low pay, because salaries for teachers have always been lower market value. I believe that the educator's employment contracts, federal exemptions that exclude educators from many safeguards, the attitude of the public, lawmakers, and even managerial staff of the district actions and attitudes are making the working situation for educators too stressful. As a former employee of the Michigan Education Association while in law school and a former Montessori teacher in Texas, I think that having educators with collective bargaining and a strong union produces an environment where educators are providing the best possible environment for the students. The salaries still need to increase to keep up with inflation and the coat of living in and around the school district. 

I do not support the expansion of charter schools. The charter school system, just like the private school system, is good for certain students, but the percentage is very low and very unique for the students. I am unable to say that the charter school system should not exist, but I do think it should be highly controlled and then regulated. The reasons for this thought is that the legal and financial oversight system are not equipped through case law, agency oversight rulemaking, and legal costs required by parents to keep the schools accountable to the students. The schools are not required to prprovideovide a FAPE (free appropriate public education) to a disabled student, they can have enrollment qualifications that prevent many students, they frequently do not  food and transportation, a parent does not have many options to help them if the charter school is harming the student in anyway unless it is criminal or in some very specific cases some federal and state laws may provide some kind of help yet it is very unlikely to be quick enough for the student's educational needs, the teachers and staff qualifications can be low, and many other issues that need to be addressed if the charter school system wants to expand or in my opinion stay in existence at the current level or any level.

My personal opinion based on observation is that the concept could be needed for some students, but the government is not willing or able to make sure that they provide a sound education to all our students in North Carolina like the public school. 

The expansion of North Carolina's Opportunity Scholarship voucher program has the potential to significantly impact the future of education in the state. Proponents argue that it provides families with increased choices, fostering competition and innovation among schools. However, ensuring accountability for public tax dollars allocated to private schools through vouchers is a critical aspect that requires careful consideration.

Anticipated Impact on Education:

Diverse Educational Models: The program could encourage the development of diverse educational models, including specialized and innovative approaches to teaching and learning.

Transparency Requirements: Enforcing transparency requirements would involve private schools disclosing information related to finances, teacher qualifications, and student outcomes.

Non-Discrimination Policies: Mandating that participating private schools adhere to non-discrimination policies to ensure fair access for all students, irrespective of background or abilities.

Research and Evidence:

My position on school vouchers is informed by a body of research that has examined the impact of voucher programs in various contexts. Studies, such as those conducted by reputable research institutions, may consider factors like student achievement, parental satisfaction, and the overall impact on the educational landscape. It is crucial to draw insights from rigorous, peer-reviewed research to inform policy decisions and ensure that the expansion of voucher programs aligns with the best interests of students and the broader community.

In summary, while the expansion of North Carolina's Opportunity Scholarship voucher program presents opportunities for increased choice and innovation, careful planning and rigorous accountability measures are imperative. My stance is grounded in the need for evidence-based policymaking, ensuring that public tax dollars are spent efficiently and that all students, regardless of the educational setting, receive a high-quality education.

Yes and no, As a family who utilizes the North Carolina ESA+ grant program to homeschool their child who has an IEP, I understand the need for a grant program for those who may not be able to be educated in their local education agency for specific reasons. I also understand firsthand that private schools do not have the stringent safeguards and qualifications required in the public school system or even in North Carolina for a home schooled child. Most parents are not equipped to hold private schools accountable under the legal system like public schools that have agencies at the state and federal levels that help parents with the financial, legal, and even emotional hardships associated with advocating for a child to obtain an education in some cases. 

The governmental entity of the public education system requires audits of financial information and evaluations of curriculum and staff qualifications. Even in the charter school system, which is a quasi-public business system, the lack of stringent financial standards of GASB have allowed misuse of funds. A private school only follows requirements under standard accounting rules for businesses and at most a heightened push for transparency if registered as a non-profit, but the only oversight at a level to find any misuse would be at the governmental grantmaking and the state does not seem willing to become the enforcement agency through the grantmaking powers under this program. After they approve a private school for the program for disabled kids, which is the program that is being expanded to all students, the state just pays the private school as a school or a tutor so long as the parent registers the student in the private school and approves the invoice. The state does not audit the private school and does not require any proof of teacher and staff qualifications along with anything showing educational improvement of the student as required under many levels of law for public schools. The state is more stringent on parents who are educating their student at home than the private school by requiring proof of some sort of education, a roll of attendance with certain amounts of days with education, yearly testing, and the ESA+ program agency approves or rejects every request for funds for any non-tuition expenditure to make sure it complies with the law concerning curriculum, therapy, or testing. 

My personal opinion based on observation is that the concept could be needed for some students, but the government is not willing or able to make sure that we are not providing a sound education to all our students in North Carolina like the public school system has been doing for generations. 

Yes, I would support any legislation to provide every student in North Carolina Public School with universal breakfast and lunch. All students should be able to attend school and be able to focus on school without the social-economic division of the food supply. The school lunch program is inside the Farm Bill at the federal level and is tied to the subsidies provided to farmers around the country, which funds the Federally Assisted National School Breakfast and School Lunch Programs. When states decide to not accept federal funds for school lunches they are also saying that farmers will not be paid in other programs that are dependent on the purchases for the Federally Assisted National School Breakfast and School Lunch Programs. Now it should not matter that farmers would be harmed too, but in today's political climate many people would be more concerned about the business owner being harmed rather than the hungry school children. 

Many states, if not all states, are having problems with their pension programs. Some are very underfunded while only one is funded. North Carolina is not as bad as many state pensions and it has improved in many areas since 2016, but it still has a high amount of unfunded liability and the General Assembly just placed more future risk by adding 2 college pensions that were underfunded while even adding benefits that were not provided in the past pension. If I am elected I would push for some funding from the state budget over a decade or so to offset the new risk from the new additions to the state pension. 

I would try to ensure all students have access to a qualified, diverse, and dedicated educator workforce that is crucial for the state's educational success. Here is a comprehensive set of policies that I would be advocate for:

Teacher Recruitment and Retention Incentives: Introduce financial incentives, such as signing bonuses and salary increases, to attract and retain high-quality educators. Competitive compensation is instrumental in attracting skilled teachers and retaining experienced ones.

Diversity Initiatives: Implement targeted initiatives to increase the diversity of the teacher workforce, including recruitment programs and scholarships for underrepresented groups. A diverse educator workforce promotes inclusivity and provides positive role models for students of all backgrounds.

Professional Development Opportunities: Allocate resources for ongoing professional development programs to support educators in staying current with best practices and advancements in teaching. Continuous learning is vital for educators to adapt to changing educational landscapes.

Mentorship Programs: Establish mentorship programs pairing experienced educators with newer teachers to provide guidance, support, and professional development. Mentorship enhances teacher retention and fosters a culture of collaboration and growth.

Reducing Administrative Burden: Streamline administrative tasks to allow educators to focus more on teaching and less on paperwork. Reducing administrative burden contributes to increased job satisfaction and effectiveness.

Wellness and Mental Health Support: Provide resources for educator wellness programs and mental health support to address the emotional challenges often faced by teachers. Prioritizing teacher well-being contributes to a healthier and more stable workforce.

By championing these policies, North Carolina can play a pivotal role in creating an environment that attracts, supports, and retains a qualified, diverse, and dedicated educator workforce, ultimately benefiting the education and success of all students in the state.

I oppose expanding general private school vouchers, and I would not push for more vouchers. I would seek to restrict general private school vouchers to at least private schools willing to meet certain requirements far more stringent than the current level in NC. 

As a family who utilizes the NC ESA+ grant program to homeschool their child who has an IEP, I understand the need for a grant program for those who may not be able to be educated in their LEA for specific reasons. I also understand firsthand that private schools do not have the stringent safeguards and qualifications required in the public school system or even in NC for a homeschooled child. 

Most parents are not equipped to hold private schools accountable under the legal system like public schools that have agencies at the state and federal levels that help parents with the financial, legal, and even emotional hardships associated with advocating for a child to obtain an education in some cases. 

My personal opinion based on observation is that the concept could be needed for some students, but not set up yet to insure that we are providing a sound education to all our students in NC in all educational settings. 

I believe the state should comply with the funding requirements set out in the Leandro ruling. It has been shuffled back in forth throughout the court system and the legislature for far too long. The money is in the general fund under unrestricted funds for 3 years, which some of it was moved to an extra inflation reserve fund and a savings reserve fund instead of funding a sound education. 

The state is NOT adequately funding our public schools in many ways. As a member of the North Carolina General Assembly, I would advocate for a comprehensive reassessment of education funding to ensure that every child has the opportunity to receive a sound basic education. 

In proposing these changes, the goal is to create a robust, inclusive, and adaptable education system that addresses the evolving needs of students. This requires a commitment to ongoing assessment, collaboration with educators and stakeholders, and a dedication to providing every child in North Carolina with the opportunity to receive a sound basic education.

I believe the state should comply with the funding requirements set out in the Leandro ruling. The ruling affirmed that the state has a constitutional obligation to provide every student with a sound, basic education, and adequate funding is essential to fulfill this mandate. Complying with the funding requirements outlined in the Leandro ruling is necessary to address educational disparities, provide equitable resources and opportunities for all students, and ensure that every child has access to a quality education. Investing in education is an investment in the future of our communities and our state, and complying with the Leandro ruling is a critical step towards achieving educational equity and excellence for all students.

If so, where would you find the money? The money for the next several years is already in the budget and in the bank without requiring any new money, but we need to change funding for our Schools in North Carolina in many ways including exceptional children. 

The top economic issues facing North Carolinians include job creation, income inequality, and access to affordable healthcare and education. If elected, addressing these challenges may involve promoting policies that stimulate job growth, implementing measures to reduce income disparity, and working towards accessible healthcare and education opportunities for all residents.

.

I support the legalization of recreational and medical marijuana in North Carolina. If elected, my approach to the legalization of recreational or medical marijuana in North Carolina would involve carefully considering public health, safety, and regulatory frameworks. I would support legalization with certain limits, such as age restrictions for recreational use, clear regulations on cultivation and distribution, and strict guidelines for driving under the influence. Additionally, I would prioritize measures to prevent misuse, promote responsible consumption, and ensure that the benefits of legalization are balanced with safeguards for the well-being of the community.

Personally, I have no problem with casinos in North Carolina and would support any plan to authorize more casinos in North Carolina that show to have positive impacts to its community. As a public servant, my stance on authorizing more casinos or expanding commercial gambling in North Carolina would depend on careful consideration of the potential social and economic impacts. I would assess community input directly from the tribes who may or may not want them, potential revenue benefits, and any potential negative consequences. Any decision would prioritize the overall well-being of the residents, ensuring a balanced approach that considers both the positive and negative aspects of such initiatives.

If elected, I would prioritize several key strategies to make state jobs attractive to talented workers and meet the public's needs. This includes competitive salaries, comprehensive benefits, opportunities for professional growth, and a positive work environment. I would also focus on creating inclusive and diverse workplaces, implementing effective training programs, and regularly assessing and updating compensation packages to remain competitive. By addressing these aspects, I aim to attract and retain talented individuals dedicated to meeting the public's needs through effective public service.

If elected, I would work to implement policies that address rising prices and cost-of-living challenges for moderate- and low-income voters. This may include initiatives to increase affordable housing options, support for job training and education, and measures to stabilize essential commodity prices. My focus would be on creating an inclusive economic environment that eases financial burdens for those facing challenges.

A significant public safety issue that concerns me is the increasing prevalence of hate crimes and discrimination related to the safety of the LGBTQ+ community. I would work to enhance law enforcement training on LGBTQ+ issues, promote inclusive policies, and advocate for legal measures to prevent discrimination such as including it in the state's hate crime bill, the civil rights act, and anti-discrimination laws at the state and local levels.. Additionally, fostering community engagement and awareness campaigns would be crucial to creating a safer and more supportive environment for the LGBTQ+ population, especially in an educational setting. My goal would be to ensure that everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation and gender identity, feels secure and protected.

Guns

A significant public safety issue that concerns me is the increasing prevalence of gun violence. As a gun owner, I would advocate for responsible gun ownership, comprehensive gun safety measures, including background checks, waiting periods, and work towards closing loopholes in existing regulations. Additionally, investing in community-based programs to address root causes of violence, such as domestic violence, poverty, and mental health issues, would be crucial. Collaborating with law enforcement, community leaders, and mental health professionals to develop a holistic approach would be part of my strategy to enhance public safety. My goal would be to find a balanced approach that upholds both the rights of responsible gun owners and the safety of the community.

I do not think the legislature should be able to take away various powers from the governor, especially if the powers are stated under the state constitution, because it is interfering with the constitutional separation of powers. Upholding the principles of checks and balances is crucial for a healthy democratic system and ensuring the effective functioning of government as addressed in the Federalist Paper No. 51. 

I support the ratification (at this point - publication in the Federal registry) of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The ERA seeks to enshrine gender equality into the U.S. Constitution, affirming that "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." Ratifying the ERA is essential to address systemic gender-based discrimination and ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender, have equal protection under the law. It's a crucial step toward achieving true gender equality in our society, and I believe it's long overdue. Ratifying the ERA would send a powerful message about our commitment to fairness, justice, and equality for all.

I would prioritize comprehensive democracy reform by taking the following actions:

1. Voting Rights Restoration: Advocate for the restoration of voting rights for people with felonies, recognizing that disenfranchisement perpetuates inequality and undermines the principles of democracy. I would work to streamline the process for individuals to regain their voting rights upon completing their sentences.

2. Voter Registration Modernization: Push for modernization of voter registration systems to make the process more accessible, efficient, and secure. This could involve implementing automatic voter registration, expanding online registration options, and ensuring that voter rolls are regularly updated and accurate.

3. Election Day Registration: Support the implementation of Election Day registration to allow eligible individuals to register and vote on the same day, thereby increasing voter participation and reducing barriers to civic engagement.

4. Campaign Finance Reform: Champion campaign finance reform measures to promote transparency, limit the influence of money in politics, and ensure that elections are not unduly influenced by wealthy donors or special interests. This may include instituting contribution limits, enhancing disclosure requirements, and exploring publicly funded campaign options.

5. Funding for County Boards of Election: Advocate for sufficient funding for county boards of election to ensure that they have the resources needed to conduct fair, efficient, and secure elections. This could involve allocating funds for voter education efforts, poll worker training, equipment upgrades, and cybersecurity measures.

Overall, I would lead by prioritizing democracy reform, engaging with stakeholders, collaborating across party lines, and mobilizing public support to enact meaningful changes that strengthen our democratic institutions and ensure that every voice is heard in the political process.

I strongly support the creation of an independent, nonpartisan commission to draw electoral maps or other efforts to end gerrymandering. Gerrymandering undermines the democratic process by allowing politicians to manipulate electoral boundaries for their own political gain, often resulting in distorted representation and disenfranchisement of voters. An independent commission would help ensure fair and impartial redistricting, promoting competitive elections and better representation of diverse communities. By removing partisan influence from the redistricting process, we can strengthen democracy, restore trust in our electoral system, and uphold the principle of one person, one vote.

I support housing incarcerated transgender individuals with the population they deem to be the safest option. As a former criminal attorney, I have helped incarcerated transgender individuals during their time find the safest option for them. It's essential to prioritize the safety and well-being of all incarcerated individuals, including transgender individuals, by respecting their self-identified gender and accommodating their needs accordingly. Placing transgender individuals in facilities that align with their gender identity not only reduces their risk of experiencing violence or harassment but also upholds their dignity and human rights. It's crucial to foster a prison environment that is inclusive, supportive, and conducive to rehabilitation for all individuals, regardless of gender identity.

I strongly support eliminating or reducing fees and fines that hinder reentry efforts and turn jails into debtors’ prisons, including the elimination of cash bail. These practices disproportionately impact low-income individuals and communities of color, perpetuating cycles of poverty and incarceration. By incorporating principles of the Eighth Amendment on to the states at the Federal Supreme Court level, we can ensure that individuals are not subjected to excessive fines or bail requirements that effectively penalize poverty. It's essential to prioritize rehabilitation and reintegration rather than punishing individuals for their inability to pay financial obligations. Moreover, we must recognize that incarcerating individuals solely because they cannot afford bail undermines the presumption of innocence and perpetuates inequality within the criminal justice system. It's time to reform these practices and prioritize justice, fairness, and dignity for all individuals involved.

I support the extension of “ban the box” to private employment. This policy prohibits employers from asking job candidates about their criminal history on job applications, thereby giving individuals with past convictions a fair chance to compete for employment based on their qualifications and skills rather than their criminal record. By removing this barrier to employment, we can help reintegrate formerly incarcerated individuals into society, reduce recidivism rates, and promote economic opportunity and stability for all. "Ban the box" policies also encourage employers to consider an individual's qualifications and potential for rehabilitation rather than making snap judgments based solely on their criminal history. Ultimately, extending "ban the box" to private employment aligns with principles of fairness, equality, and second chances, benefiting both individuals with criminal records and society as a whole.

 As we reimagine public safety, it's essential to shift our focus towards holistic approaches that address the root causes of crime and promote community well-being. This involves investing in social services, mental health resources, and community-based programs aimed at preventing crime and supporting individuals in need.

One aspect of reimagining public safety involves reallocating resources from traditional law enforcement to community-based initiatives that address underlying issues such as poverty, homelessness, and substance abuse. By investing in affordable housing, job training programs, and mental health services, we can create opportunities for individuals to thrive and reduce the likelihood of involvement in criminal activities.

Furthermore, fostering strong relationships between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve is crucial for building trust and promoting collaboration. Implementing community policing initiatives, restorative justice programs, and civilian oversight boards can help foster accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies while empowering communities to play an active role in shaping public safety policies.

Moreover, addressing systemic inequalities and injustices within the criminal justice system is paramount for reimagining public safety. This includes reforming sentencing laws, ending cash bail, and promoting alternatives to incarceration, such as diversion programs and rehabilitation services.

Overall, reimagining public safety requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach that prioritizes community well-being, addresses root causes of crime, and promotes equity and justice for all individuals.

Yes, I am supportive of labor unions and collective bargaining for both private and public employees. As a former employee of the Michigan Education Association and a former Montessori teacher in Texas, I have seen firsthand the benefits that collective bargaining and strong unions can bring to educators and other workers. Labor unions provide a vital platform for employees to advocate for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions, ensuring that their voices are heard and their rights are protected.

In the context of education, collective bargaining allows teachers and school staff to negotiate contracts that address issues such as workload, class sizes, professional development opportunities, and fair compensation. By working together through their union, educators can address systemic challenges within the education system and create a better learning environment for students.

Additionally, labor unions play a crucial role in promoting economic justice and reducing income inequality by advocating for policies that benefit working families, such as living wages, affordable healthcare, and retirement security. Collective bargaining empowers workers to have a say in their workplace and helps to create a more equitable and inclusive society.

While I recognize that there are varying perspectives on the role of labor unions, I believe that collective bargaining is an essential tool for empowering workers, promoting economic fairness, and strengthening our communities. As such, I am committed to supporting labor unions and collective bargaining rights for both private and public employees.

To ensure the availability of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income residents within our community, I propose the following strategies:

1. Incentivize Affordable Housing Development: Offer tax incentives, grants, or subsidies to developers who build affordable housing units. This can encourage the private sector to invest in affordable housing projects.

2. Zoning and Land Use Policies: Implement zoning regulations that mandate a certain percentage of new developments to include affordable housing units. Additionally, identify underutilized or vacant land for affordable housing projects.

3. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborate with private developers, non-profit organizations, and community groups to leverage resources and expertise in creating affordable housing developments.

4. Housing Vouchers and Subsidies: Provide housing vouchers or rental assistance programs to low-income residents to help them afford housing in the private market.

5. Preservation of Existing Affordable Housing: Implement policies to preserve existing affordable housing stock, such as rent control measures or rehabilitation programs for aging buildings.

6. Community Land Trust: Establish community land trusts to acquire land and develop affordable housing that remains permanently affordable for future generations.

7. Mixed-Income Housing: Encourage mixed-income housing developments to promote socioeconomic diversity within neighborhoods.

8. Streamline Approval Processes: Simplify and expedite the approval process for affordable housing developments to reduce costs and bureaucratic delays.

9. Transit-Oriented Development: Encourage development near public transportation hubs to increase accessibility to affordable housing options for low-income residents.

10. Supportive Services:  Provide access to supportive services such as childcare, healthcare, and job training programs to help residents maintain stable housing and improve their economic situation.

By implementing a combination of these strategies, we can work towards ensuring that affordable housing remains accessible for low- and moderate-income residents within our community.

If elected, I am committed to playing a proactive role in passing in our area and laws across the state. These ordinances and laws are crucial for promoting equality and protecting the rights of all individuals regardless of their race, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, disability, or any other characteristic.

To achieve this goal, I will:

1. Advocate for Inclusive Policies: I will work with local government officials, community leaders, and advocacy groups to draft comprehensive NDOs that address various forms of discrimination and ensure equal treatment for everyone in our community.

2. Build Coalitions: I will collaborate with diverse stakeholders, including businesses, religious organizations, civil rights groups, and residents, to build broad support for NDOs. By fostering dialogue and understanding, we can overcome opposition and rally support for inclusive policies.

3. Educate the Public: I will engage in outreach efforts to educate the public about the importance of NDOs and dispel misconceptions or fears surrounding them. This may include hosting community forums, distributing informational materials, and leveraging social media platforms to raise awareness.

4. Lobbying and Legislative Advocacy: I will work with other elected officials at the local, state, and possibly national levels to advocate for the passage of NDOs. This may involve lobbying legislators, testifying at hearings, and mobilizing grassroots support to pressure decision-makers to enact nondiscrimination protections.

5. Enforcement and Oversight: Once NDOs are in place, I will ensure they are effectively enforced and monitored to address any instances of discrimination. This may involve establishing mechanisms for reporting violations, conducting investigations, and imposing penalties for non-compliance.

There is not a NDO in my area, I will actively work to bring similar ordinances forward across the state by:

1. Sharing Success Stories: I will highlight the positive impact of NDOs in our community and share success stories with policymakers and advocates in other regions. Demonstrating the benefits of nondiscrimination protections can help build momentum for similar legislation elsewhere.

2. Collaborating with Allies: I will collaborate with other municipalities and organizations that have successfully passed NDOs to share resources, strategies, and best practices. By working together, we can coordinate efforts and amplify our collective impact.

3. Engaging in State-Level Advocacy: I will advocate for nondiscrimination protections at the state level by supporting or sponsoring legislation that mirrors the NDOs in our area. This may involve working with state legislators, governors, and other officials to advance inclusive policies statewide.

Overall, my goal is to be a tireless advocate for equality and justice, both locally and statewide. By championing nondiscrimination ordinances and promoting inclusive policies, I am committed to creating a more equitable and welcoming environment for all residents.

As an advocate for equality and inclusion, I support the repeal of HB142's restroom and shower provision. Allowing cities and counties to pass ordinances protecting the access of transgender people to these facilities is crucial for promoting dignity, safety, and equal rights for all individuals, regardless of gender identity. By repealing discriminatory policies and embracing inclusive measures, we can create communities where everyone feels respected and supported in accessing public facilities that align with their gender identity.

I support the requirement for a background check for every gun purchase. Background checks are crucial because a person's eligibility to own a gun can change over time due to various factors such as changes in mental health status or involvement in incidents like domestic violence. They are essential for ensuring that firearms do not end up in the hands of individuals who pose a risk to public safety. By conducting thorough background checks, we can help prevent firearms from being obtained by individuals with a history of violence, criminal activity, or mental illness. Additionally, I believe that using a standardized background check system, rather than relying on local sheriff departments, can help ensure fairness and prevent discrimination or bias in the process of granting permits. By implementing comprehensive background checks, we can enhance public safety and prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands. This measure is a fundamental step in promoting responsible gun ownership and reducing the likelihood of gun-related tragedies.

I support Extreme Risk Protection Order legislation, also known as Red Flag Laws. These laws allow for the temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose a risk to themselves or others, providing an important tool for preventing gun violence and saving lives.

A significant public safety issue that concerns me is the increasing prevalence of gun violence. As a gun owner and a victim of several gun violence eventsas a child, I would advocate for responsible gun ownership, comprehensive gun safety measures, including background checks, waiting periods, and work towards closing loopholes in existing regulations. Additionally, investing in community-based programs to address root causes of violence, such as domestic violence, poverty, and mental health issues, would be crucial. Collaborating with law enforcement, community leaders, and mental health professionals to develop a holistic approach would be part of my strategy to enhance public safety. My goal would be to find a balanced approach that upholds both the rights of responsible gun owners and the safety of the community.

I support an increase in the minimum wage above $15 per hour. The current minimum wage is not sufficient to meet the basic needs of workers, particularly given the rising cost of living. While $15 per hour is a significant improvement, further increases may be necessary to ensure a truly livable wage, especially in areas with higher costs of living. 

To implement this, I would advocate for a phased approach, gradually increasing the minimum wage over time to allow businesses to adjust and minimize potential negative impacts. Additionally, I would work to ensure that any increase in the minimum wage is accompanied by policies to support small businesses, such as tax credits or grants, to help offset any additional costs. It's essential to strike a balance between supporting workers and businesses to create a more equitable and sustainable economy.

Yes, I support adjusting the tipped minimum wage to equal the minimum wage that exists across other industries. Tipped workers often face instability and income fluctuations, which can make it challenging to make ends meet. Equalizing the minimum wage for tipped workers ensures fair and consistent compensation, regardless of whether their income relies on tips. This change would help address income inequality and provide greater financial stability for workers in the service industry. Additionally, it would promote fairness and dignity in the workplace by recognizing the value of all forms of labor. We should start with an equal minimum wage and move away from tip culture . 

It depend on the sheriff's beliefs, I do not think that any local sheriffs or police department should be an extension of federal law such as ICE or immigration enforcement especially 287g, because local law enforcement is to focus on safety issues such as domestic violence and other assaults, property damage or threat, and abuse or neglect of children and the elderly. Those activities cannot be processes if the people in the community are scared about being turned over to ICE. 

We just need to get sex included into Title II of the Civil Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity along with other gender-based discrimination plus get a statewide nondiscrimination law that includes more nondisabled protected classes. At this time North Carolina is with only 4 other states that do not have public accommodations law for anyone who is a nondisabled person. We have about 14 cities and counties with local nondiscrimination ordinances. 

I fully support banning discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in hiring and employment. Discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression is unjust and undermines the principles of equality and fairness in the workplace. To support such a ban, several measures can be implemented:

1. Enact Comprehensive Non-Discrimination Laws: Advocate for the passage of comprehensive non-discrimination laws at the federal, state, and local levels that explicitly prohibit discrimination in hiring, promotion, and employment practices based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. These laws should provide robust protections for LGBTQ+ individuals and ensure equal opportunities in the workplace.

2. Enforce Existing Anti-Discrimination Policies: Strengthen enforcement mechanisms for existing anti-discrimination policies, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals are protected from discrimination in employment. This may involve increased funding for enforcement agencies, training for investigators, and outreach to educate employers and employees about their rights and obligations.

3. Raise Awareness and Promote Education: Raise awareness about the prevalence and impact of LGBTQ+ discrimination in the workplace through education and advocacy efforts. This includes providing training for employers, human resources professionals, and employees on LGBTQ+ inclusion, diversity, and anti-discrimination policies. By promoting understanding and empathy, we can help create more inclusive and welcoming work environments.

4. Support Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives: Encourage employers to implement diversity and inclusion initiatives that prioritize LGBTQ+ inclusion and create a culture of respect, acceptance, and belonging for all employees. This may include establishing LGBTQ+ employee resource groups, offering diversity training programs, and implementing inclusive hiring practices.

5. Provide Legal Support and Resources: Ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals have access to legal support and resources to address instances of discrimination in the workplace. This may involve partnering with legal advocacy organizations, providing pro bono legal assistance, and establishing helplines or support networks for individuals facing discrimination.

6. Monitor and Report Discrimination: Establish mechanisms for monitoring and reporting instances of discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals in hiring and employment. This may include collecting data on discrimination complaints, conducting audits of hiring practices, and holding employers accountable for discriminatory behavior.

By implementing these measures and supporting the ban on discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in hiring and employment, we can work towards creating more equitable, inclusive, and respectful workplaces where all individuals are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Many parts of North Carolina especially Union County are growing with development of  houses without upgrading roads, sewers, schools, and other developments for safety. The State of North Carolina has placed planning and funding of these issues on the level of the state government and also has prevented local government to require the developers to pay for these improvements in their development costs. There are roads too small to allow all the people to evacuate if a disaster hits some seasonal of the state. There are areas where development permits had to be slowed or when stopped until Sewers could be built. There are schools that are doubling with a couple of years without any plans or funding to build new schools. If the developers are building homes and commercial properties, they should be the people who pay for extra infrastructure. 

Leandro Candidate Commitment 2024

Every Child NC Candidate Commitment – State & local policymakers

1. I understand that, for nearly 30 years, North Carolina lawmakers from both parties have failed to meet their constitutional obligation to provide all children in the state with a sound basic education, beginning in early childhood. The burden of this failure has been disproportionately borne by children from historically marginalized communities.

2. I recognize that the responsibility to provide every child in the state with access to a sound basic education falls on state leaders. Education leaders at the county, district, and school levels are important partners for creating excellent early education and public school systems, but the ultimate responsibility falls upon the state.

3. I respect the authority of the courts in determining whether North Carolina is meeting its constitutional obligations to children and will do everything within my power to ensure compliance with Leandro court orders.

4. I reject the argument that separation of powers prevent the courts from placing responsibilities upon the legislature, understanding that such arguments are a product of the racist attempts of past legislatures to avoid compliance with court-led efforts to end racial segregation.

5. I reject the argument that the constitutional rights of children are contingent upon economic conditions.

6. I will prioritize investing resources that benefit historically marginalized student groups and families so long as race, ethnicity, economic background, regional location, disability, gender identity and sexual orientation, immigration status, and language remain predictive of educational opportunity.

7. I will listen to the voices of historically marginalized communities to ensure progress is being made to remedy our state's ongoing failure to deliver equal opportunity to all students.

[for NCGA candidates]

8. For the 2024 Short Session, I pledge to implement the spending and policy recommendations contained in the Leandro Action Plans that have been submitted to the Courts.

Education Position Questionnaire

Public Schools First NC 

MY POSITION FOR NC:

1. I SUPPORT raising per pupil funding for all public schools to at least the national average and I support fully funding LEANDRO.

2. I SUPPORT raising pay for public school teachers to at least the national average and reinstating master’s and other relevant advanced degree pay. Furthermore, I SUPPORT additional pay for teachers who achieve nationally recognized certifications and pay for teachers who take on additional duties and 

responsibilities (such as coaching or tutoring afterschool).

3. I SUPPORT increasing the numbers of school counselors, school psychologists, school social workers, and school nurses for all public schools to at least the recommended national ratios per pupil.

4. I SUPPORT providing full public funding for pre-K for all eligible children in North Carolina.

5. I SUPPORT providing full funding for K-5 enhancement teachers for art, music, physical education, and world languages.

6. I SUPPORT increasing per pupil funding for textbooks and other instructional resources (digital and hard copies), supplies, etc. to at least
pre-recession levels.

7 . I SUPPORT programs that have been demonstrated to reduce the achievement gaps for economically disadvantaged students, including programs to improve public school equity, integration, and inclusion.

8 . I SUPPORT fair and equitable evaluation of teachers and schools using a variety of metrics for student and teacher performance, not just standardized test scores.

9 . I SUPPORT phasing out school vouchers for private schools, and ensuring that existing private schools receiving public voucher funds meet the same accountability and performance standards as public schools.

10. I SUPPORT a moratorium on new charter schools until stronger accountability standards and better authorization mechanisms are implemented; including empowering local school boards with the ability to create charters and keep them under their governance.

All responses: https://publicschoolsfirstnc.org/engage/education-position-questionnaire/#Responses

I will oppose any attempts to ban Planned Parenthood from serving Medicaid patients or from participating in any other publicly funded program.

Protecting Safe, Legal Abortion Care

• I  support the fundamental right to obtain a medically safe, legal abortion.
• I  oppose all legislation that attempts to restrict a person’s ability to make their own reproductive health care decisions, including the decision to have an abortion. 
• I support efforts to repeal harmful, medically unnecessary laws that restrict access to abortion and that mandate misinformation in medical care, like SB 20.
• I oppose all legislative attempts to impose TRAP requirements on abortion providers, including ASC licensing requirements, hospital admitting privileges, other building requirements, and staffing policies that do not provide any medical benefit.
• I oppose all legislation that directs doctors to provide false information to their patients concerning an “abortion reversal” course of treatment that is not proven safe or effective by scientific research, clinical trials or medical best practice.

Ensuring Access to Birth Control

• I oppose any legislative effort to deny people insurance coverage for FDA approved methods of birth control?

Helping Teenagers Make Life-long Responsible Decisions 

• I support medically accurate, evidence-based sex education that includes  age-appropriate information about abstinence, as well as all FDA-approved birth control methods, including condoms, as a means of preventing sexually transmitted infections.
• I support instruction by trained experts on sexual and reproductive health to provide information on key topics such as obtaining consent and who is capable of giving consent.

Confidential Health Services

• I  oppose all legislative attempts to weaken or abolish confidential health services for teenagers for mental health counseling, substance abuse, family planning, and the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections?

Equal Treatment and Access to Health Care for LGBTQ North Carolinians

• I oppose all legislative attempts to discriminate against LGBTQ+ people in North Carolina, including attacks on access to housing, athletic teams, employment, education, and healthcare based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Reproductive Justice in Health Care Delivery

• I support legislation to reduce racial disparities in reproductive healthcare, and address systemic racism in the healthcare system.

Yes, I believe my values and policy positions align with those of the NCAE. 

• I think that students work best with food available for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. 
• I think that vouchers and charters should be very limited, if available at all, to areas that may not be able to be met in a public education setting. 
• I think all schools either public, charter, or private should be required to provide education to all students regardless of disability, race, religion, and other protected classes, including sexual orientation and gender identity under sex. 
• I think that funding from the state should focus on funding the pension fund and raising salaries. 
  • I believe in collective bargaining, because it produces a good environment for the educators and students.
• I think that strong bills protecting educators and students are required to become laws to keep public education strong. 
  • The American public education system is the backbone of the country.